It is interesting to find a common focus for interpreting
information such as this. It all depends on one’s partisan viewpoint. In the
briefest possible way I would like to get to the bottom of all the problems
arising from Splane’s assertions that there were no appointed representatives
of God up to 1900 or later.
If you govern a religion then you require some credence from
the Bible to justify your existence. The Catholic Church for example claims its
descent from Jesus’ appointee Peter, the Watchtower claims appointment by holy
spirit in 1919. The ever changing perception of the FDS is their attempt to
justify their bedrock teaching by perpetually directing the faithful to
be mindful of their leadership. It is group
narcissism. If they are wrong about the Watchtower in-house myth of 1919, then there can be no basis for following this
religion, they should admit it and pack their bags.
My solution to this is simple. The fundamental manifestation
of God is “holy spirit”. It has no basis in reality, it is unknowable by the
human senses...so if you have your head secured to your neck you are advised to
not believe infantile stories such as ”holy spirit”. If you believe in magic
fairy dust otherwise called “holiness” then you will continue to struggle with
reality. If you believe that the Bible is the inerrant word of God you will
forever be mired in delusions and mysteries.
Since the Greek scriptures are a fusion of all politically important
religious beliefs of the fourth century, they are an attempt at harmonising the
disparate superstitions of that era. It was inevitable they would not all gel
together...but with magic ”holy spirit”, all things can be made to appear in
union. Bear in mind the target audience back then lived in a pre-scientific,
pre- literate superstitious world populated with gods and demons... And people
want to base their life on this today?
Ok most of us here don’t like the Watchtower organisation
but some, like Melete Vivlon take as their starting point that the Bible is to be
respected as sacred.
Here lies the fundamental problem for all who try to give any
interpretation of the Bible, be it JW or other religious persuasions; you can
contrive endless dogma and doctrine
from it according to your disposition. There
can never be a coherent, water-tight interpretation of the Bible. It is a will o’ the wisp, a dream. The
reason for this is that much of the Bible is a fusion of pagan folk myth
masquerading as divine truth.
"Holiness" is a confidence trick, give it up.